Risk-based lung cancer screening performance in a universal healthcare setting

0
  • Sung, H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Cancer Statistics: A 2020 Special Report on Lung Cancer (Canadian Cancer Society, 2020); https://cdn.cancer.ca/-/media/files/cancer-information/resources/publications/2020-canadian-cancer-statistics-special-report/2020-canadian-cancer-statistics-special-report-en.pdf

  • Aberle, D. R. et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 395–409 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Koning, H. J. et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 503–513 (2020).

  • Moyer, V. A. & U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 160, 330–338 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Screening for Lung Cancer with Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) (CAG-00439N) (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2015); https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncacal-decision-memo.aspx?proposed=N&NCAId=274

  • The US national lung cancer screening programme. Lung Cancer Policy Network (2022).

  • Interactive map of lung cancer screening. Lung Cancer Policy Network (2022).

  • Schneider, E. et al. Mirror, mirror 2021: reflecting poorly—health care in the U.S. compared to other high-income countries. The Commonwealth Fund (2021).

  • Ivers, N., Brown, A. D. & Detsky, A. S. Lessons from the Canadian experience with single-payer health insurance: just comfortable enough with the status quo. JAMA Intern. Med. 178, 1250–1255 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Koning, H. J. et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 503–513 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzone, P. J., White, C. S., Kazerooni, E. A., Smith, R. A. & Thomson, C. C. Proposed quality metrics for lung cancer screening programs: a National Lung Cancer Roundtable project. Chest 160, 368–378 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Candal-Pedreira, C., Ruano-Ravina, A., Provencio, M., Fernandez-Villar, A. & Perez-Rios, M. Lung cancer screening quality criteria: a population perspective. Chest 160, e329–e331 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Partnership Against Cancer & Pan-Canadian Lung Cancer Screening Network. National Lung Cancer Screening Quality Indicators Report, 1st edn (Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 2017).

  • Martin, D. et al. Canada’s universal health-care system: achieving its potential. Lancet 391, 1718–1735 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison L. F. & Saint-Jacques N. Five-year cancer survival by stage at diagnosis in Canada. Health Rep. 34, 3–15 (2023).

  • Wait Times (Ontario Health, 2021); https://www.ontariohealth.ca/public-reporting/wait-times

  • Habbous, S. et al. The effect of diagnostic assessment programs on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with lung cancer in Ontario, Canada. Ann. Thorac. Med. 16, 81–101 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, J. K. & Fortenberry, J. L. Jr. The hub-and-spoke organization design: an avenue for serving patients well. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17, 457 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucharczyk, M. J., Menezes, R. J., McGregor, A., Paul, N. S. & Roberts, H. C. Assessing the impact of incidental findings in a lung cancer screening study by using low-dose computed tomography. Can. Assoc. Radio. J. 62, 141–145 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Regis, S. M. et al. Outcomes of positive and suspicious findings in clinical computed tomography lung cancer screening and the road ahead. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 19, 1371–1378 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Olivo, M. A. et al. Patient adherence to screening for lung cancer in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e2025102 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. K. et al. The UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial: a pilot randomised controlled trial of low-dose computed tomography screening for the early detection of lung cancer. Health Technol. Assess. 20, 1–146 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, D. E. et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 325, 971–987 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, P. B. et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA 307, 2418–2429 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammemagi, M. C. et al. Selection of individuals for lung cancer screening based on risk prediction model performance and economic factors—the Ontario experience. Lung Cancer 156, 31–40 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatore, C. G., Sullivan, D. R., Pappas, M. & Humphrey, L. L. Patient-centered outcomes among lung cancer screening recipients with computed tomography: a systematic review. J. Thorac. Oncol. 9, 927–934 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Haaf, K. et al. Performance and cost-effectiveness of computed tomography lung cancer screening scenarios in a population-based setting: a microsimulation modeling analysis in Ontario, Canada. PLoS Med. 14, e1002225 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo, Y. R., Chan, M. V., Habib, A. R., Lui, I. & Ridley, L. Pneumothorax rates in CT-guided lung biopsies: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors. Br. J. Radiol. 93, 20190866 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Indigenous Peoples in Ontario (Ministry of Indigenous Affairs, 2018); https://www.ontario.ca/document/spirit-reconciliation-ministry-indigenous-relations-and-reconciliation-first-10-years/indigenous-peoples-ontario

  • Chiefs of Ontario and Cancer Care Ontario. Cancer in First Nations in Ontario: Risk Factors and Screening. (2017).

  • Targeted Screening for Lung Cancer with Low Radiation Dose Computed Tomography: Standard Protocol Prepared for the Targeted Lung Health Checks Programme (NHS England, 2019); https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/targeted-screening-for-lung-cancer/

  • Allemani, C. et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet 391, 1023–1075 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 20, 1493–1505 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, M. P. et al. Receipt of recommended follow-up care after a positive lung cancer screening examination. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2240403 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • National Lung Screening Trial Research Trial. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 1980–1991 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aberle, D. R. et al. Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 920–931 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsky, P. F. et al. Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment. Ann. Intern. Med. 162, 485–491 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Lung Screening Program Locations (Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 2020); https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/find-cancer-services/ontario-lung-screening-program-locations

  • Darling, G. E. et al. Organized lung cancer screening pilot: informing a province-wide program in Ontario, Canada. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 111, 1805–1811 (2021).

  • Lung Screening Referral Form (Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 2020); https://www.cancercareontario.ca/sites/ccocancercare/files/assets/LungCancerScreening_ReferralForm.pdf

  • Tammemagi, M. C. et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 728–736 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. K. et al. Integrating smoking cessation into low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: results of the Ontario, Canada pilot. J. Thorac. Oncol. 18, 1323–1333 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) (American College of Radiology, 2019); https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Lung-Rads

  • Lung-RADS® v2022 (American College of Radiology, 2022); https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/Lung-RADS/Lung-RADS-2022.pdf

  • Lung-RADS® v2022. Summary of Changes and Updates (American College of Radiology, 2022); https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/Lung-RADS/Lung-RADS-2022-Summary-_Final.pdf

  • Radiology Quality Assurance Program Manual–Ontario Lung Screening Program (Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 2021); https://www.cancercareontario.ca/sites/ccocancercare/files/assets/RadiologyQualityAssuranceProgramManual.pdf

  • Darling, G. E. et al. Organized lung cancer screening pilot: informing a province-wide program in Ontario, Canada. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 111, 1805–1811 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *